ext_6324 ([identity profile] blades-of-grass.livejournal.com) wrote in [personal profile] blades_of_grass 2010-08-11 07:37 pm (UTC)

>> the underlying idea is to use the characters - in most suitable way - to fit certain narrative

Yes, that seems to be the general idea. And I like this direction of analysis much better than the "fandom is for comfort" one - not because the other is not true, but because it depends on the immediate circumstances around the text rather than on the text itself.

I mean, by analysing the text we can (probably, I'm no specialist) establish that it so closely matches a certain type of narrative that it could not be unintentional. And there lies the proof of its fanficness (fanficity?)

But what will remain from the "fandom=comfort zone" idea, if we analyze the text, say, 10 years hence, when fandom no longer exists or no one recognizes the hurt-comfort trope, or there is no adult alive who has not watched HP saga - in other words, when we are left alone with the text? If people will continue reading it, would it follow that it is literature, not fanfic?

I agree that the fandom as a whole has too many disparate entities - and I know next to nothing about bandoms and others. So yes, I'm talking about a tiny part of the whole.

Post a comment in response:

This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting